[2025:RJ-JP:33831] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 70/2025 Priya Sharma D/o Late Shri Ramavtar Sharma, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Dangarthal, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through PP 2. Hanuman S/o Jagdish, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Village Dangarthal, Police Station Niwai District Tonk, Presently Residing At Maharishi Gautam Nagar, Beelwa, Tonk Road, Jaipur Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Urga Sen Yadav Mr. Purushottam Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP Mr. Abhijeet Panchariya Mr. Ramji Lal, SHO, PS-Niwai, Tonk HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 26/08/2025 1. The instant bail cancellation application has been filed by the complainant petitioner with a prayer to cancel the bail granted to the accused respondent vide order dated 27.01.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after release of the accused respondent on bail in view of the order dated 27.01.2025, the accused respondent has tried to influence the prosecution witnesses and gave beating while they were going to the Court for evidence. 3. The accused respondent has also filed reply to this bail cancellation application. [2025:RJ-JP:33831] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-70/2025] 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and perused the material made available on record. 5. As per the inquiry report submitted by the inquiry officer on the complaint made by the complainant as regards the threatening to the prosecution witnesses, the inquiry officer has stated that no any instance of threatening has happened. It has also been stated that both the complainant and accused party are members of same family. However, to maintain law and order and the peace, the accused respondent-Hanuman was bound down. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the inquiry report submitted by the inquiry officer on the complaint of the complainant, the Court finds no ground to cancel the bail granted to the accused respondent-Hanuman. 7. Accordingly, this bail cancellation application is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /117