Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 19113 of 2018 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J.
HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J.
1. When the matter is taken up, it is very fairly stated by Sri Ram Autar Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner that that due to subsequent development, the matter has now become infructuous and prays for its dismissal.
2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
3. This order is passed in the presence of Shri Lal Sahab Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents. October 13, 2025 Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amrish Sahai, Ram Autar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ashok Kumar, C.S.C., Lal Sahab Yadav (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Jai Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad