Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190624 (ALL)

RAJESH GAUTAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

ABAIL/13258/2021 · 2025-10-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13258 of 2021 Court No. - 73 HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. None present on behalf of applicant. However, Sri Kunwar Tejendra Bahadur Singh, learned AGA for the State is present. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in F.I.R./Case Crime No.74 of 1997, under Sections 409, 420, 465, 468, 471, 120-B IPC and Section 13(2) P.C. Act, Police Station Hussainganj Sadar, District Lucknow with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail during trial. 3. The instant anticipatory bail application is pending since the year 2021, therefore, it reflects, either applicant has lost the interest in the matter or by efflux of time, the instant anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. 4. In view of above, the instant anticipatory bail application stands dismissed. 5. However, it is open for the applicant to file recall application if cause of action still survives. October 10, 2025 S.A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pawan Kumar Singh, Vijay Kumar Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sameer Jain,J.) Rajesh Gautam .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SALMAN AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad