Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19062 (GAU)

ALA UDDIN BARBHUIYA AND 5 ORS v. DR. OM PRAKASH AND ANR

Cont.Cas(C)/568/2022 · 2025-07-20

Nelson Sailo

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010203282022 2025:GAU-AS:9320 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/568/2022 ALA UDDIN BARBHUIYA AND 5 ORS HEAD TEACHER, TAPANG LINE L.P. SCHOOL, HAILAKANDI, VILL. ALGAPUR PART-III, P.O. ALGAPUR PART-V, P.S. ALGAPUR, DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN-788150. 2: TAJ UDDIN BARBHUIYA ASSTT. TEACHER TAPANG LINE L.P. SCHOOL HAILAKANDI VILL. ALGAPUR PART-III P.O. ALGAPUR PART V P.S. ALGAPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 3: SUJIT KUMAR NATH HEAD TEACHER SUNATIPAR L.P. SCHOOL HAILAKANDI VILL. ALGAPUR PART-III P.O. ALGAPUR PART-V P.S. ALGAPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 4: MUSLIM UDDIN BARBHUIYA ASSTT. TEACHER SUNATIPAR L.P. SCHOOL HAILAKANDI VILL. ALGAPUR PART-III P.O. ALGAPUR PART-V Page No.# 2/3 P.S. ALGAPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 5: AHMED ISA LASKAR HEAD TEACHER TILLA GRAM L.P. SCHOOL HAILAKANDI VILL. SAYEDBOND PART-I P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR P.S. ALGAPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 6: SAIDUL ISLAM MAZUMDER ASSTT. TEACHER TILLA GRAM L.P. SCHOOL HAILAKANDI VILL. SAYEDBOND PART-I P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR P.S. ALGAPUR DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM VERSUS DR. OM PRAKASH AND ANR THE MISSION DIRECTOR, SARBA SIKSHA ABHIJAN MISSION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19. 2:SHRI IQBAL HUSSAIN BARBHUIYA THE DISTRICT ELEMENTERY EDUCATION OFFICER (D.E.E.O) HAILAKANDI P.O. HAILAKANDI PIN-788151 DIST. HAILAKANDI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I H LASKAR, MR. P K DEKA,MR J H LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B CHOUDHURY (r-1), MR P NAYAK (r-1) Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER Date : 21-07-2025 Mr. JH Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order of this Court has been complied with and therefore, the contempt petition has become infructuous. Mr. P Nayak, learned counsel appears for the respondent No. 1 and agrees to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. In view of above, the contempt petition stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant