Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19062 (CHH)

MAHIP SINGH @ IMTIYAZ KHAN v. SMT. BHARTI SINGH

CRR/498/2024 · 2025-08-11

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40548 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 498 of 2024 Mahip Singh @ Imtiyaz Khan S/o Abharchand Singh Aged About 36 Years (At Present 40 Years) R/o Chudi Centre, In Front Of Zila Panchayat, Mahip Singh, Kondagaon, Tahsil And Distt. Kondagaon, C.G. ... Applicant versus 1 - Smt. Bharti Singh W/o Mahip Singh @ Imtiyaz Khan Aged About 32 Years (At Present 38 Years), R/o Infront Of Anand Children Hospital, Torwa, P.S. Torwa, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, C.G. 2 - Om Kumar Singh S/o Mahip Singh @ Imtiyaz Khan, Aged About 16 Years (At Present 21 Years), R/o Infront Of Anand Children Hospital , Torwa, P.S. Torwa, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - Rahul Singh S/o Mahip Singh @ Imtiyaz Khan, Aged About 15 Years (At Present 20 Years), R/o Infront Of Anand Children Hospital , Torwa, P.S. Torwa, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Ku. Disha Singh D/o Mahip Singh @ Imtiyaz Khan, Aged About 12 Years (At Present 18 Years), R/o Infront Of Anand Children Hospital , Torwa, P.S. Torwa, Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Wasim Miyan, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 12/08 /202 5 1. Heard Mr. Wasim Miyan, learned counsel for the Applicant. Also heard Mr. Shashi Kumar Kushwaha, learned counsel for the respondents. RAHUL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by RAHUL DEWANGAN 2 2. The present petition has been filed by the Applicant seeking following relief: “”It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the revision petition and the order dated 12.04.2024 passed by the learned Second Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur (C.G.) may kindly be quash, and may kindly be directed to consider and decide the applications of the petitioner, in the interest of justice. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter has become infructuous. 4. in view of the above, instant criminal revision is dismissed as having rendered infructuous./- 5. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Rahul Dewangan