Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190603 (ALL)

IDAL VEER SINGH ALIAS INDAL VEER v. STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/36337/2025 · 2025-10-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36337 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondent no.1 and Sri Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondents nos.2 to 4. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no. 3 be directed to pay an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs) along with interest at the rate of 10% per annum to the petitioner from the date of death of his son, i.e., 11.07.2023, as compensation for the death caused due to the negligence of the Electricity Department. He further submits that respondent no. 2 be directed to consider and decide the application/representation submitted by the petitioner before him. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.3-Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division, Dakshinanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Up-Sansthan, Firozabad, U.P., within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rudra Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Baleshwar Chaturvedi, C.S.C. Idal Veer Singh Alias Indal Veer .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. October 17, 2025 Arif WRIC No. 36337 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad