[2025:RJ-JP:24620] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7890/2025 Om Prakash, S/o Shri Ram Karan Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Todpura, Tehsil-Navalgrah, District- Jhunjhunun, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302003 2. Block Development Officer, Neemka Thana, District-Sikar, Rajasthan 3. Gram Panchayat Guhala, Through Its Administration, Sunita Chouhan, Aged About 47 Years, Panchayat Samiti- Guhala, Rajasthan-332706 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Anilendra Pande (throug VC) with Mr.Ravi Kumar Palsaniya For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 04/07/2025 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the validity of the notice dated 04.04.2025 issued by the Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar to the Administrator to the Gram Panchayat Gwala by which a decision has been taken to remove the encroachment mentioned therein. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is having a valid title over the subject land, on the basis of the registered sale deed. Counsel submits that on the earlier occasion also, a notice was issued to the petitioner by the concerned [2025:RJ-JP:24620] (2 of 2) [CW-7890/2025] Panchayat on 18.11.2024 which was duly replied by him, but without considering the same, straightaway the subsequent notice dated 04.04.2025 has been issued by the Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar, hence under these circumstances, interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 4. This Court is not going to enter into the controversy raised by the respondents against the petitioner as to whether the petitioner is having a valid title over the land in question or not or he has made any encroachment over the same. All these matters are required to be looked into by the competent Authority while deciding the application/ reply submitted by the petitioner, on the basis of his documents. 5. The instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing direction to the respondents to consider and decide the application/ reply submitted by him and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereafter, within a period of four weeks from today. 6. For a period of four weeks, no coercive action be taken against the petitioner. 7. In case, the petitioner feels aggrieved by any order passed by the respondents, he would be at liberty to approach the appropriate forum of law for redressal of his grievances. 8. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /23