Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190584 (ALL)

VINEET TALWAR AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/1871/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1871 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Nitin Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel, who has filed power on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.65863 of 2025, State Vs. Vineet Talwar and others, arising out of Case Crime No.399 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 323 and 506 IPC and Section ¾ Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Ashiyana, District Lucknow, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I. (Ayodhya Prakaran), Lucknow. 3. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and the original compromise deed dated 15.10.2025 has been annexed as Annexure-6 to the application, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Avanindra Singh Parihar, Avanish Kumar Singh, Maitreyee Singh, Toshendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Nitin Kumar Srivastava Vineet Talwar And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of with a direction to both the parties to appear before the court concerned on 09.12.2025 and file their comprise application. If such compromise application is filed, the court concerned shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within six weeks from that date. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court making compromise to be part of the record and a report to that effect shall also be send to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not. The court concerned will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise. It will also be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 7. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid criminal case. 8. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the applicant(s) after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. November 24, 2025 Rao/- NA528 No. 1871 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench