M/S SUBRAMANYA CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD v. STATE BY CBI
WP/6687/2021 · 2025-01-22
M G Uma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19057 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19057 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2577 WP No. 6687 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 6687 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S. SUBRAMANYA CONSTRUCTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LTD NO.42, INDUSTRIAL SUBURB 2ND STAGE, YESHWANTHPUR BANGALORE-560 022 REP. BY DIRECTOR SRI. K.N.BALASUBRAMANYAM …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. CHANDRASHEKARA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE BY CBI BELLARY ROAD BANGALORE-560 031
2.
CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK REGIONAL OFFICE VASANTHNAGAR BANGALORE-560 052
3.
M/S. ALILA INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.19 HMT FACTORY MAIN ROAD BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 013
Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:2577 WP No. 6687 of 2021
REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR SRI. NAYINI MANOHARA …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2-SERVED-UNREPRESENTED;
SRI. A. SAMPATH, ADVOCATE FOR R3 -[ABSENT])
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECTION 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR RC.037/2020 A OO11 DTD.8.10.2020 ON THE FILE OF THE R-1 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES UNDER SECTION 120B AND 420 OF THE IPC AS BEING ILLEGAL AND VOID AND QUASH THE ARRAIGNMENT OF PETITIONER IN THE FIR RC NO.037/2020 A 0011 DTD.8.10.2020 ON THE FILE OF THE R-1 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES UNDER SECTION 120B AND 420 OF THE IPC AS BEING ILLEGAL AND VOID.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
Learned counsel Sri.P. Prasanna Kumar for respondent No.1 has no objection to dismiss the petition as withdrawn.
Memo is placed on record.
Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
AP, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4