HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 16015 of 2023 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Heard Sri Anjeet Kumar Varma, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Parv Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anubhav Sinha, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon a judgement and order dated 31.08.2024 passed in Writ C No.24331 of 2024 (Smt. Madhuri Devi Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others). It is further argued by him that since the controversy involved in the present case is identical as in the case of Smt. Madhuri Devi (supra) hence present writ petition should also be disposed of in the same terms. 3. This fact is also admitted very fairly by Sri Anubhav Sinha, learned counsel for the respondent no.3-Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Prayagraj. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 5. In this view of the matter and also in the interest of justice, respondent no.3-Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Prayagraj is directed to make payment to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Parv Agarwal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anubhav Sinha, C.S.C., Vipul Kumar Smt. Shayra Bano .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner pursuant to the decision of the District Review Committee, in which the claim of the petitioner mentioned at serial no.42, dated 19.06.2020, copy of which is appended as annexure-1 to the writ petition, within a period of ten weeks from today. 6. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition is allowed. October 14, 2025 Pramod Tripathi WRIC No. 16015 of 2023 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad