HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 51157 of 2013 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. Today when the matter is taken up, it is informed by the counsel for the petitioners that due to subsequent development the present writ petition has become infructuous. 2. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 13, 2025 Swati Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun K. Singh Deshwal, H.N.Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Usha Srivastava (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Vinod Kumar Nishad Prop. Prayag Construction Co. And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad