Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19054 (AP)

MOGANTI NAGAMANI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13210/2025 · 2025-05-08

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13210 OF 2n2fi Between: Moganti Nagamani. W/o Sivakumar, age 61 Years, Superintendent Working Women Hostel, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Dept, of Women Development and Child Welfare Dept., Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. The Director, Women Development and Child Welfare Department Guntur, Guntur District. Regional Joint Director of Women Development and Child Welfare, Eluru, Eluru District 2. 3. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents not considering the representations dated 12.03.2025, 20.3.2025 of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law, violation of provisions of Article 14 16, 21 of Constitution of India and violation of principles of natural Justice and further direct the respondents to consider the representations dated 12.03.2025, 20.3.2025 of the petitioner, in light of G.O.Ms. No. 5 dated 1.2.2001 before effecting the promotions to the C.D.O.P. posts. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representations dated 12.03.2025, 20.3.2025 of the petitioner, in light of G.O.Ms. No. 5 dated 1.2.2001, before effecting the promotions to the C.D.O.P. posts. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI T.V.V. KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES - II The Court made the following: APHC010263882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] FRIDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13210/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER Moganti Nagamani AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s:- . .to issue an appropriate Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring action of the respondents not considering the representations dated 12.03.2025, 20.03.2025 of the petitioner as illegal arbitrary contrary to law violation of provisions of Article 14 16 21 of Constitution of India and violation of principles of natural Justice and further direct the respondents to consider the representations dated 12.03.2025, 20.03.2025 of the petitioner in light of G.O.Ms.No.5 dated 01.02.2001 before effecting the promotions to the CDOP posts, and to pass such other order or orders....” Heard Sri T.V.V.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and 2. learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services II appearing for the respondents. 3. Petitioner is working as Superintendent with respondent No.2 and stated to be eligible for promotion to the post of Child Development Project Officer (CDPO) in terms of G.O.Ms.No.5 dated 01.02.2001. Petitioner seems to have submitted representations dated 12.03.2025 and 20.03.2025 for consideration of her case for promotion which is stated to be pending. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits it would suffice to direct respondent Nos.1 & 2 to dispose of the petitioner’s representations. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents submits 4. that as petitioner’s representations are pending and the same will be considered in accordance with law. 5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, with the consent of both the counsel, the writ petition is disposed at the admission stage directing respondent Nos.1 & 2 to pass appropriate orders on petitioner’s representations dated 12.03.2025 and 20.03.2025 within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order 6. as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SDI- A. VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh, Dept, of Women Development and Child Welfare Dept., Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Director, Women Development and Child Welfare Department Guntur, Guntur District. 3. Regional Joint Director of Women Development and Child Welfare, Eluru, Eluru District 4. One CC to Sri T.V.V. Koteswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Services - II, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies sree HIGH COURT DATED:09/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.1321 Oof 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS