SABITA KUMARI ALIAS SAVITA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./3859/2025 · 2025-09-23
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19052 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19052 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:29489 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3859 of 2025
Sabita Kumari @ Savita Kumari, aged about 37 years, wife of Deepak Kumar Mandal, resident of Gulzarbag, Godda Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Godda, District- Godda, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioner
Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand
2. Ashish Kindo, son of name not known, Hatia Chowk, Main Branch Godda, Chief Manager, SBI, Godda, P.O. and P.S. Godda, District-Godda, Jharkhand (Informant) .…. … Opposite Parties
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner
:Ms. Adya Mishra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate
06/ 23.09.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the O.P. No.2.
2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Godda Town P.S. Case No. 71 of 2025, registered under sections 316(2), 318(2) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was suffering heart attack and for one year he was under treatment and unit has not been opened during that time and for unit loan of Rs. 10,50,000/- was taken and the allegations are made that unit was not opened and amount was diverted. She then submits that for non-payment of loan amount, the criminal case has been lodged. She further submits that the bank is having remedy of recovery of amount however criminal case has been lodged. She further submits that the Co-ordinate Bench of this court by order dated 18.07.2025 has directed the petitioner to show Bonafide to the effect that the petitioner is ready to deposit the entire amount and direction was issued to deposit 50% of the loan amount. She submits that pursuant to that direction the petitioner has already deposited 50% of the amount i.e. Rs.
( 2025:JHHC:29489 )
5,25,000/-. She then submits that the petitioner is intending to deposit rest of the loan amount and she is in process of arranging money. On these grounds, she submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail.
4.
Mr. P.A.S. Pati, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2-Bank is not disputing the fact that a sum of Rs. 5,25,000/- has been deposited by the petitioner pursuant to order of the Co-ordinate Bench. However, he submits that entire amount has not been deposited as yet.
5.
In view of above and considering that 50% amount has already been deposited by the petitioner and for rest of the amount the petitioner is intending to deposit.
6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the above named, petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of her surrender / arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Godda, in connection with Godda Town P.S. Case No. 71 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023.
Dt.23.09.2025
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-