LAL BABU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/1298/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190511 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190511 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1298 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in Case Crime/FIR No.384 of 2023, under Sections 406, 419, 420 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Balrampur.
3. In terms of the FIR, it has been alleged by the informant that the applicant while filing mutation application did not disclose the legal heirship of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the mutation applied has been dismissed.
5. Learned AGA opposes the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of allegation, a prima facie case of anticipatory bail is made out. I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. The present application for anticipatory bail is accordingly disposed of.
7. In the event of arrest, let the applicant - Lal Babu be released on anticipatory bail in aforesaid FIR number till the filing of report on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.5000/- each separately to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Iqbal Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Lal Babu .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the satisfaction of trial Court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required and will co-operate with the investigation; (b) The applicant shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court; (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 Anupam ABAIL No. 1298 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench