Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190491 (ALL)

AAMEEN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/11147/2025 · 2025-11-17

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11147 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.0359 of 2025 under Sections 69, 87 BNS, P.S.- Sandi, District- Hardoi. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant, aged about 20 years, was at home when the applicant came and enticed her, thereafter, made physical relations on the false pretext of marriage. The victim in her statement under Section 180 BNSS, has not supported the prosecution version and stated that on the false pretext of marriage, physical relations were formed at a different place. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS, the victim admitted that she had been talking to the applicant for the past two years and wanted to solemnize marriage with him. The tentative age of the victim is 22 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and the huge variance in the two statements coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 20.07.2025 and has no previous criminal antecedent, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant- Aameen be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to her furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Kumar, Anita Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Aameen .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 17, 2025 V. Sinha BAIL No. 11147 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench