Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190477 (ALL)

PRAMOD KUMAR KASHYAP v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

/8947/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8947 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Shobhit Singh, learned Counsel for the complainant. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.100 of 2025, under Section 65(1) of BNS and Section 5J(ii)/ 6 of POCSO Act, Police Station Gomti Nagar Vistar, District Lucknow. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 13 years was was taken by the applicant and wrong was committed around six months ago and the victim was pregnant and is carrying a fetus of six months. In the medical authorities, the victim stated that she knew the applicant and was friendly to him. There is no definite document with regard to the exact age of the victim at this stage. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the two statements of the victim that the relationship occurred six months age and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 29.05.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Pramod Kumar Kashyap be released on bail in the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Diwakar Singh, Anurag Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ajai Kumar Singh, Kamakhya Gupta, Shobhit Singh Pramod Kumar Kashyap .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) aforesaid first information report on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 24, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 8947 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench