NIKITA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
/10976/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190465 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190465 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10976 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.
2. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents no. 2 to 4 to take proper legal action against the respondent no. 5 in pursuance to the First Information Report registered by the petitioner vide Case Crime No. 0683 of 2025 under Sections 109 (1) of B.N.S, 2023 at Police Station- Kotwali District- Ayodhya, a copy of which is annexure 1 to the writ petition.
3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the aforesaid First Information Report having been lodged against the respondent no. 5, no action has been taken by the respondents-authorities and that the respondent no. 5 is also threatening the petitioner.
4. On the other hand, learned AGA states on the basis of instructions sent by Sri Ashish Chandra Tripathi, Inspector, Police Station- Kotwali District- Ayodhya dated 20.11.2025 that the respondent no. 5 has been granted anticipatory bail by the competent Court.
5. Considering the aforesaid, there would not be any occasion for this Court to issue direction to the respondents-authorities to take action against the respondent no. 5 inasmuch as the respondent no. 5 has already been granted anticipatory bail. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avneesh Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Nikita Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
6. In case the petitioner is feeling threatened by the respondent no. 5 it is always open for her to proceed in accordance with law. So far as the security is concerned, it is open for her to apply for the same under the provisions of relevant scheme for granting of protection.
7. Disposed of. November 24, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 10976 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench