SMT.ARUNA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P.THRU PRIN.SECY.HUMAN RESOURCE and LABOUR and ORS.
WRIA/4348/2020 · 2025-12-12
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190463 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190463 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4348 of 2020 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State and Sri Manish Vaish,learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 4 to 6 are present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 12, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Kumar Pandey, Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Col.(Ex.) A.K.Srivastava, Hem Lata, Hemlata Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., P.K.Sinha, S.L. Vaish (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt.Aruna Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru Prin.Secy.Human Resource And Labour And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench