Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010263452022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI SMB FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 830/2023 Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the
Order passed in C.F.R. No.72 of 2020 in O.S. No.17 of 2017 dated 17-02-2020 by the III Additional District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District, A.P. Between: Katragadda Sai Krishna, S/o.Subba Rao, aged about 33 years, R/o.H.No.21-30-681, 3 rd Advocate Prakasam District. Lane, Kammapalem, Ongole ...Petitioner/Plaintiff AND Vejendia Ananda Kumar, S/o.Venkateswarlu, aged 33 years Advocate's Clerk, R/o.H.No.1-108, Lane, Gopalapuram, Ongole Prakasam District. ...Respondent/Defendant lA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.17 of 2017 on the file of III Additional District Judge's Court, Ongole, Prakasam District pending CRP. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Nuthalapati Krishna Murthy Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Pavan Kumar Pasupuleti The Court made the following:
>- APHC010263452022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) a!¥i0 [3505] m FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 830/2023 Between: K Sal Krishna ...PETITIONER AND V Ananda Kumar ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.NUTHALAPATI KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent:
1.PAVAN KUMAR PASUPULETI
/ 2 X The Court made the following order: The present revision petition is filed questioning the
order dated 17.02.2020 passed in C.F.R.No.72/2020 in O.S.No.17/2017 on the file of the 111 Additional District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District. As it can be seen from the e-courts service of the District
2. Judiciary, the Suit vide O.S.No.17 of 2017, on the file of ill Additional District Judge, Ongole, Prakasam District, was decreed by judgment and decree dated 31.12.2024. In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the
3. instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. The III Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Prakasam District at Ongole.
2. One CC to Sri Nuthalapati Krishna Murthy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri Pavan Kumar Pasupuleti, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Three CD Copies BSV
J ■ ^ HIGH COURT DATED:20/06/2025
ORDER CRP 830/2023 [ 0« SEP 2025 )|) vo SectitnXi^ ts DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS petition