HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7892 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at the Bar that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and the charge sheet has also been submitted against the petitioner and the petitioner has preferred a criminal appeal before this Court which is still pending disposal, as such, this writ petition is rendered infructuous. 2. Learned A.G.A. could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 3. In view of the above statement, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 17, 2025 R Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : O.P. Tiwari, Ashish Shukla, Beer Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Dhirendra Vikram Singh, Sudhir Kumar Rai (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Dinesh Kumar @ Dinesh Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM ASARE MORYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench