HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8081 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Ved Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for the informant as well as learned AGA for the State. Whereas, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the informant despite notice. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.486 of 2023 under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 325, 504, 506 IPC, P.S.- Kotwali Dehat, District- Sultanpur. 3. In terms of the FIR, allegation were levelled against all the accused including the applicant. It is further alleged that the two co-accused persons were enlarged on bail vide separate orders dated 15.12.2023 and 16.12.2023. The applicant is in custody since 16.12.2023 and his criminal history has been explained in para no.-31 of the bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the informant while opposing argues that during the pendency of trial, threats were issued to the witnesses, for which, FIR Nos.662 of 2024 and 0058 of 2024 were lodged, in which, it was alleged that the applicant was threatening the witnesses. It is further argued that all the fact witnesses have been examined before the trial court except one formal witness, who is not being examined and trial is being delayed on the instance of the applicant. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arti Shukla, Anand Dubey, Prashant Dubey, Sadhana Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ved Prakash Yadav Alok Verma @ Gautam Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, ground of parity as well as the fact that if the applicant, being enlarge on bail, can have no adverse effect on the trial in question as well as the witnesses have already been examined, coupled with the fact that the applicant is in custody since 16.12.2023, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Alok Verma @ Gautam Verma be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 8. The S.P., Sultanpur is directed to ensure that the one witness remaining, who is the medical officer, is examined without giving any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and he is produced for examination before the trial court within a period of one month. 9. The trial court shall thereafter, proceed to examine the said witness and make an endeavour to conclude the trial, expeditiously. 10. The Registrar (Compliance) is directed to communicate this order to the S.P., Sultanpur as well as trial court concerned for necessary compliance, forthwith. November 18, 2025/V. Sinha BAIL No. 8081 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench