[2025:RJ-JP:36700] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3174/2002 1. Ram Narain son of Shri Radhey Lal 2. Kanhiya Lal son of Shri Radhey Lal 3. Prem Chand son of Shri Radhey Lal 4. Prhlad son of Shri Radhey Lal 5. Smt. Godawari Devi D/o Shri Radhey Lal 6. Smt. Gulabi Devi wife of Shri Radhey Lal Residents of Asalpur, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Board Of Revenue, Rajasthan Ajmer 2. Assistant Collector, Sambher Lake, District Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Nangi wife of Shri Chouth Mal 4. Ghisa Lal son of Shri Chouth Mal 5. Kailash Chand son of Shri Chouth Mal 6. Manbhar Daughter of Shri Chouth Mal 7. Supyari d/o Shri Chouth Mal (deceased) 8. Pushpa d/o Shri Chouth Mal 9. Smt. Bhura wife of Sonya 10. Uqma son of Sonya 11. Mungfali d/o Sonya (w/o Shri Ram Swaroop) 12. Sita Devi D/o Sonya (w/o Shri Kailash) 13. Ramesh Son of Sonya 14. Noratam son of sonya 15. Kanchan daughter of Sonya 16. Rajendra son of Sonya (Minor under guardianship pf Smt. Bhuri-Mother) R/o Village Asalpur, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gourav Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/09/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and [2025:RJ-JP:36700] (2 of 2) [CW-3174/2002] (i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the impugned judgements/orders dated 29-1-82 (Annexure-5) and dated 9-1-97 (Annexure-8) of the Assistant Collector, Sambhar Lake as well as judgements/orders dated 19-10-2001 (Annex.9) and dated 15-2-2002 (Annexure-10) of the Board of Revenue may kindly be quashed and set aside. (ii) by further appropriate writ, order or direction the application for substitution of Sonya defendant may kindly be accepted and the respondents no.9 to 16 may kindly be taken on record in place of Sonya and the suit (Annex.1) may kindly be ordered to be decided according to law. (iii) any other beneficial order or direction which the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioners. (iv) costs of the present writ petition may kindly be quantified in favour of the petitioners.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned orders passed by the Subordinate Revenue and Revenue Appellate Courts. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that the subject land has been sold by the petitioners by way of registered sale deeds on 05.11.2012 and 13.12.2012 in favour of Durga Devi, Gheesa Lal, Bhuri Devi and Narayani Devi, hence, under these circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioners to continue with this petition and it has become infructuous. 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/8