Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19043 (CHH)

SURENDRA RATHI v. VIKAS PARAKH

WP227/434/2023 · 2025-01-24

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:4362 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 434 of 2023 1 - Surendra Rathi S/o. Lalchand Rathi, Aged About 52 Years R/o. A/16, Mahesh Clolony, Pulgaon, Durg ........Defendants No. 1 And 2, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - Madan Jain S/o. Mohanlal Jain Aged About 70 Years R/o. House No. 24, Mahaveer Colony, Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Vikas Parakh S/o. Late Gautam Chand Parakh, Aged About 45 Years R/o. Vishal Jewelers, Jawahar Chowk, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg .........Plaintiffs, Chhattisgarh 2 - Vishal Parakh, S/o Late Gautam Chand Parakh, Aged About 37 Years R/o. Vishal Jewelers, Jawahar Chowk, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Roopa Sancheti D/o. Late Gautam Chand Parakh, Aged About 41 Years W/o. Late Ritesh Sancheti R/o. Vishal Jewelers, Jawahar Chowk, Durg, Tehsil And District Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 4 - Jayanti Lal Parakh S/o Uttam Chand Parakh, Aged About 55 Years R/o Rudra Mobile, Chandi Mandir Road, Near Panchmukhi Hanuman, Durg District Durg, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shikharchand Parakh S/o Late Ranulal Parakh Aged About 51 Years R/o Durg Tehsil And District- Durg ...........Resp. No. 6, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Kusum Bai W/o Shri Naresh Chand Parakh Aged About 57 Years R/o Vinay Super Sale, Beside Marwadi School, Barai Para, Durg Tehsil And District- Durg ..........Defendant No. 7, Chhattisgarh. 7 - Smt. Phoolu Bai W/o Shri Prakashchand Parakh Aged About 62 Years R/o Jain Traders Station Road, Beside Welcome Kiraya Bhandar Durg Tehsil And District- Durg ..........Defendant No. 8, Chhattisgarh 8 - Suresh Parakh S/o Late Ranulal Parakh Aged About 47 Years R/o Durg Tehsil And District- Durg ............Resp./defendant No. 3, Chhattisgarh 9 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector ...........Resp./defendant No. 4, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Arpan Verma, Advocate, holding the brief of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent No. to 3 : Mr. P. R. Patankar, Advocate For State : Mr. Dashrath Prajapti, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24.01.2025 3 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the respective parties would submit that by efflux of time, the instant petition has become insfructuous. 2) Recording the submission made by the counsel for the parties, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim