MAHESH GUPTA AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/9706/2025 · 2025-10-17
Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary, Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190428 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9706 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to opposite party no. 3 is hereby dispensed with. 3. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 15.12.2024 bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 0351 of 2024, for the offence under Section 106(1), 352, 115(2) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita (BNS), 2023, registered at Police Station Hazratganj, District Lucknow Madhya (Commissionerate Lucknow). 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita (BNS), 2023. 5. Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in re ; Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another : (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Yadav, Rishabh Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Mahesh Gupta And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
another, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 6. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 8. However, It is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 25.10.2025 at 11.00 a.m. sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation.
Thereafter, he shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which, the protection of this order would be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. October 17, 2025 Om CRLP No. 9706 of 2025 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench