Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19041 (CHH)

DEEPAK KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3010/2025 · 2025-04-30

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:19605 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3010 of 2025 1 - Deepak Kumar S/o Sevak Ram Aged About 45 Years Presently Posted As Lecturer, Government Higher Secondary School District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - District Education Officer District Balod, C.G. 3 - Block Education Officer Block- Gunderdehi, District Balod, C.G. 4 - Principal Govt. Hr. Sec. School, Kamroud, Block Gunderdehi, District Balod, C.G. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 30/04/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, who is presently posted as Lecturer at Government Higher Secondary School, District AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.05.02 10:45:51 +0530 2 / 2 Mahasamund, is seeking a direction towards the respondents to grant the benefit of two advance increments as per the circular dated 30/03/2010 and 25/06/2024 Annexure P-4 and P-5 respectively. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner has submitted a representation to the District Education Officer, which was forwarded by the Principal vide Annexure P-6 dated 27/08/2024, but the same has not been decided till date. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that if any representation is pending before the D.E.O. the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submission made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2/District Education Officer to consider and decide the representation filed by the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of 45 days from the receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE Amardeep