WAZIR HUSSAIN AND ORS. v. STATE TH.FOREST DEPTT.AND ORS.
SWP/1092/2015 · 2025-09-17
Vinod Chatterji Koul
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1904 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1904 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 21
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: SWP No. 1092/2015
Wazir Hussain & Ors. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None
V/s
State of J&K & Ors. ... Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER 17.09.2025
Learned counsel while appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter, which suggests that either the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed or he has lost interest in prosecuting the same and also, with the passage of time the present writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE Jammu 17.09.2025 Suraj K. Singh