RANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DIST. MAGISTRATE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/10146/2025 · 2025-10-17
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190393 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190393 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10146 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Sri Manu Dixit, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents No.2 and 3 by filing his vakalatnama in Court today, which is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties.
3. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the writ petitioner has sought for the following substantial reliefs:-
"i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. parties concerned not to harass and torture the petitioner for realization of the personal loan taken by her deceased husband from the opp. Party no.3, in the interest of justice and also not adopt the recovery proceeding or coercive measure against her for realization of same. ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opp. party no.1 to consider and decide the application of the petitioner contained in Annexure no.1 to this writ petition in the interest of justice."
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Kumar Pandey, Kailash Nath Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Srivastava Rani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Dist. Magistrate Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
the deceased, who was the husband of the petitioner, had taken a loan. There is no personal guarantee by the petitioner, nor was any security granted. However, the Bank is harassing the petitioner for repayment of the loan.
5. Sri Arjun Krishna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bank, very fairly submits that in case there is any document or agreement on the basis of which recovery can be carried out, the same will be done by following due procedure. He has given an undertaking that the petitioner will not be harassed by anybody for recovery of the loan.
6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 cks/- WRIC No. 10146 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench