Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19037 (HP)

BAKTABAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./901/2025 · 2025-07-21

Sandeep Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.901 of 2025 Date of Decision: 21.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Baktabar Singh …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Dixit Sahotra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No. 2 to 4. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 16.07.2025, issued under the signatures of Commissioner (Temples)- cum-Deputy Commissioner, Kangra at Dharamshala, learned counsel for the petitioner states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid communication, which is taken on record, this Court finds that pay fixation of the petitioner has been done on a notional basis w.e.f 21.10.2019 to 16.03.2021 and financial benefits/ arrears have been allowed w.e.f. 17.03.2021 i.e. from the 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 actual date of regularization of the services. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that amount, if not already paid in terms of aforesaid communication, shall be credited within two weeks. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, the same are closed reserving liberty to the petitioner to get the present proceedings revived, in case needful as has been undertaken to be done within two weeks, is not done, enabling this Court to pass appropriate orders towards execution and implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 21, 2025 (sunil)