SUREKHA KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
/11094/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190356 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190356 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11094 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that on account of subsequent developments, he does not intend to press the instant petition at this stage and prays that this petition be dismissed as not pressed. To the aforesaid prayer, the learned A.G.A. has no objection.
3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. November 24, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Surekha Kumari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench