VINEET DIXIT @ SATYAM DIXIT AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/8827/2024 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190338 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190338 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8827 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a statement at bar that in the instant case, the investigation has already been concluded and the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioners. As such the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Learned A.G.A. for the State does not dispute the aforesaid facts. In view of the statement made, the present writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to approach the appropriate forum at appropriate stage. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. November 24, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kr. Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Vineet Dixit @ Satyam Dixit And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench