Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190326 (ALL)

SURENDRA KUMAR @ GOPI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/9000/2025 · 2025-10-17

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9000 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed with a prayer to quash the summoning order dated 12.02.2024 passed by Additional Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Court No.2/ Judicial Magistrate, Sitapur as well as the entire proceedings arising out of Complaint Case No.3546 of 2022, (Seema @ Jyoti Maurya vs. Surendra Kumar @ Gopi & others) under Section 498A IPC & Section 4 D.P. Act, Police Station Biswan, District Sitapur. 3. At the very outset, counsel for the applicants states that the offence is punishable upto seven years and applicants will surrender before the court below and apply for bail. However, he has submitted that the applicants may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386). 4. It is therefore, directed that in case the applicants surrender before the Court below within one week from today and prefer bail application, the court below will decide the said bail application within two weeks thereafter taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 5. For a period of three weeks. no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Satyendra Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Surendra Kumar @ Gopi And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. The application stands disposed of. 7. It is made clear that no application for extension of time shall be entertained if this order is not availed by the applicants in the stipulated period of time. October 17, 2025 Pks A482 No. 9000 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench