HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9934 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. None is present for the opposite party No. 2 and 3. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., and perused the record. 3. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants praying for quashing of the entire proceedings of S.C./S.T. Case No. 2747 of 2015, State v. Sanjay Yadav & ors., case crime no.118 of 20214, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 336, 452, 504, 506 IPC, and Sections 3(x)(1), S.C./S.T. Act, P.S. Alapur, District- Ambedkar Nagar, pending in the court of learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Ambedkar Nagar, including the chargesheet No. 09/15, dated 08.06.2015, in respect of the applicants herein. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that vide order dated 17.10.2025 a direction was given to the trial court to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned trial court had verified the contents of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the trial court vide report dated 06.11.2025. 6. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the trial court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bharat Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Matadeen Singh @ Prabhat Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed and the proceedings of S.C./S.T. Case No. 2747 of 2015, State v. Sanjay Yadav & ors., case crime no.118 of 20214, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 336, 452, 504, 506 IPC, and Sections 3(x)(1), S.C./S.T. Act, P.S. Alapur, District- Ambedkar Nagar, pending in the court of learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Ambedkar Nagar, including the chargesheet No. 09/15, dated 08.06.2015, in respect of the applicants herein, are hereby quashed. November 24, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9934 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench