Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19032 (CHH)

SMT. SARIKA LAKRA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2873/2025 · 2025-04-28

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:19006 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2873 of 2025 1 Smt. Sarika Lakra W/o Anil Lakra Aged About 49 Years Women Supervisor R/o Near Gomti Petrol Pump, Gharghora District- Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health Department Mahanadi Bhavan Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 Collector Raigarh Chhattisgarh 3 Chief Medical And Health Officer Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) 4 Block Medical And Health Officer Gharghora, District Raigarh (C.G.) 5 Block Medical And Health Officer Chapple, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Shri S.S. Choubey, P.L. JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.04.29 10:59:27 +0530 2 Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 28/04/2025 Heard. 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, is questioning her transfer by order dated 01.04.2025 (Annexure P-1) from present place of posting Primary Health Center Tenda Nawapara to Primary Health Center Barra under CHC Chapple. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that daughter of the petitioner is studying in class 12th and mid term transfer will effect her studies. He further submits that father in law of the petitioner also resides with her, who is aged about 84 years and the petitioner herself is having health issues. He further submits that due to transfer to new place of posting, the petitioner will suffer irreparably. He further submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation but the same has not been decided till date. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents/ State on instructions submits that, as far as, the transfer of employees of the State government is concerned, the State government has decided to constitute a committee to consider the grievance of the employees in case of transfer and placed a copy of the order 3 dated 03.03.2025. He further submits that if the petitioner will approach the said committee, the committee will decide the same in accordance with the relevant transfer policy and relevant law. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and the documents on record. 5. Hence, looking to the grievance of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall approach the committee constituted by order dated 03.03.2025 with a representation within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case of filing of the representation, the said committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and the policy within a period of 30 days from the date of filing of the representation. Till then, the transfer order dated 01.04.2025 shall remain stayed. 6. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. 7. The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the committee about the order of this court. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE Jyoti