SAAIMA ANSARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/9633/2025 · 2025-12-08
Abdul Moin, Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190319 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190319 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9633 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned AGA for the respondents no.1 to 3.
2. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No. 0202 of 2025, under Sections 137 (2) of B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District- Bahraich .
3. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 03.11.2025 sent by Ravi Khokar, Circle Officer, Bahraich, states that a final report dated 27.10.2025 has been submitted in the matter before the supervisory authority.
4. Upon the same being pointed out learned counsel for the petitioners states that he does not intend to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. December 8, 2025 Pachhere/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Kumar Maurya, Vikas Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Saaima Ansari And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench