- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:18038 WP No. 28697 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 28697 OF 2018 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LUCY FURTADO W/O LATE PAUL FURTADO, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O FURTADO HOUSE, KUDAR THOTA, MALPE, KODAVOOR POST, UDUPI TALUQ AND DISTRICT. 2. MR. VINCY FURTADO S/O LATE PAUL FURTADO, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O FURTADO HOUSE, KUDAR THOTA, MALPE, KODAVOOR POST UDUPI TALUQ AND DISTRICT. 3. SMT. VEERA W/O PATRIC FURTADO D/O PAUL FURTADO AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O KUJEKOLE, KANARKALBETTU, KANIDIVER VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUQ AND DISTRICT. 4. SMT. VIMALA FURTADO , W/O LEACYD ALNUDE, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O NADE HUSE & POST, PADUKONE, KUNDAPUR TALUQ AND DISTRICT. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:18038 WP No. 28697 of 2018 5. MR. VINOD FURTADO S/O LATE PAUL FURTADO AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O FURTADO HOUSE, KUDAR THOTA, MALPE, KODAVOOR POST, UDUPI TALUQ AND DISTRICT. 6. MR. VICTOR S/O LATE PAUL FURTADO AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O FURTADO HOUSE, KUDAR THOTA, MALPE KODAVOOR POST UDUPI TALUQ AND DISTRICT. 7. MR PATRIK FURTADO S/O LAWRENCE FURTADO AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O KUJEKOLE, KANARKAL BETTU, KANDIDIVER VILLAGE, UDUPI TALUQ AND DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. YOHAN, PETITITONER (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SMT. MARY PRASCILA, W/O LATE VALERIAN ANDREW FURTADO, D/O T. AROGYADAS, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 2. AVIL FURTADO S/O LATE VALERIAN ANDREW FURTADO, AGED ABOUT 4 YEARS REP. BY MOTHER MARY PRASCILA BOTH ARE R/O CARE OF SREENIVASLYER COMPOUND, HOUSE NO.8, WARD NO.3, MARTIN ROAD, BALLARI. …RESPONDENTS - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:18038 WP No. 28697 of 2018 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE CR.M.C.NO.83/2018 IN THE FILE OF THE HONBLE FIRST ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C. COURT AT BALLARI AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 12.01.2024, the office objections has not been complied. There is no appearance on part of the petitioners today also. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 CT: BHK