Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190300 (ALL)

PRASHAT KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF NAGAR VIKAS GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/9885/2025 · 2025-10-07

Amitabh Kumar Rai, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9885 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents and Dr. Manoj Kumar Dubey, Advocate who has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of the opposite parties no.3 & 4, which is taken on record. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(I) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the opposite parties no.3 and 4 to take appropriate action for the approval of map for 'Red Rose Public School' over Gata No. 96 and 97 situated in the Village- Bhajmarmau, Tehsil- Mohanlalganj, District- Lucknow to run a new educational institute in the aforesaid village expeditiously in the time bound manner, in order to secure the ends of justice;" 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he has applied for sanction of map for construction of building for Red Rose Public School and has deposited the requisite amount in this regard also, but his application remained pending and no orders have been passed. The petitioner has been forced to approach this Court because of such pendency of application as any delay in sanctioning the map will lead to delay in construction of his building. 4. The counsel for the opposite parties no. 3 & 4 has informed this Court Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Sunder Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manoj Kumar Dubey Prashat Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Nagar Vikas Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) there was some difficulty earlier because of seizure of financial and administrative powers of the Chairperson of the Zila Panchayat. Now, such difficulty has been removed and the appropriate orders regarding application made by the petitioner shall be passed within time as given by this Court. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.3 to decide the application of the petitioner within three weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him. 6. It is clarified that we have not entered into the merits of the claim of the petitioner. October 7, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 9885 of 2025 2 (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench