HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 11182 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Mr. Rama Nand Yadav, learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to re-deterine/re-fix the pension/family pension of the petitioner after providing due service benefits to her deceased husband. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no.2 to consider and provide due service benefits of the deceased husband of the petitioner such as time scale and promotional pay scale and other service benefits from due date along with arrears @ 18% interest." 3. It is submitted that petitioner's husband died while in harness due to which he was unable to agitate for his claims and prayers so made clearly indicates a recurring cause of action accrued to petitioner. 4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.2 i.e. Principal Chief Conservator of Forest & Head of Department, U.P., Lucknow or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 22, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi, Arjun Singh Yadav, Rama Nand Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Jaibun Nisha @ Jaibun .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Forest U.P. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench