IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE n-mM i' l;'- < ‘\ : o / PRESENT OP A r.. ,X' THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 1.T?n7 OF on-tn Between: 1. K.Obaiah S/o Narayana, Aged about 65 2. G.Sanjeevarayudu S/o Sanjeevaiah, Aged about 61 3. M.Krishnaiah S/o Narasimhulu, Aged about 66 4. M.Suseela, W/o Srinivasulu, Aged about 63 5. K.Ramaiah, S/o Narayana, Aged about 69 6. P.Narasimhulu S/o Kumbhaiah, Aged about 70 7. Nadipi Guraiah S/o Guraiah, Aged about 45 8. Avula Naidu, S/o Pedda Guraiah, Aged about 38 9. G.Kondamma W/o Nagaiah, Aged about 77 years years. years years. years years years years. years, A.Obulamma W/o Chinna Guraiah, Aged about 72 10. years. (All are agriculturists and residents of T.Ramapuram village Mattam, YSR Kadapa District) Bramhamgari ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur. 2. The District Collector, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The Tahsildar, B.Mattam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring, the inaction of the respondents particularly 3'"^ respondent in considering and disposing of the application dated. 31-12-2024 submitted in Revenue Sadassalu for incorporation of digital signature in the online web land in respect of Petitioners' respective bits of land of Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.88/4, Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.88/6, Ac.4.00 cents in Sy.No.85/1, Ac.2.78 cents in Sy.No.85/2, Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.88/5, Ac. 1.51 cents in Sy.No.89/1 and Ac.1.32 cents in Sy.No.89/2, Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.88/2, Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.88/1, Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.88/7 and Ac.3.00 cents in Sy.No.88/3 of Rekulakunta B.Mattam Mandal YSR Kadapa District as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, high handed dilatory and consequently direct the respondents particularly 3 respondent to dispose of the application of the petitioners submitted 31-12-2024 for incorporation of digital signature in the online web land in respect of Petitioners' respective bit of land and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper circumstances of the case. may and on in the lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct 3^^ respondent to dispose of the application petitioners submitted on 31-12-2024 for incorporation of digital signature i the online web land in respect of Petitioners' respective bit of land pending of the in disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI L.J. VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: A®HC010263142025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0*0 [3329] 0Ri:«•A FRIDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13207/2025 Between: ...PETITIONER K Obaiah AND ...RESPONDENT The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.LJVEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1.GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 2 : / THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 13207/2025 ssORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- "to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents particularly 3''^ respondent in considering and disposing of the application dated 31.12.2024 submitted in revenue sadassalu for incorporation of digital signature in the online web land In respect of petitioners’ respective bits of land of Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.88/4, Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No. 88/6, Ac. 4.00 cents in Sy.No. 85/1, Ac.2.78 cents in Sy.No.85/2, Ac.5.00 cents in Sy.No.88/5, Ac. 1.51 cents in Sy. No. 89/1 and Ac. 1.32 cents in Sy. No. 89/2, Ac. 3.00 cents in Sy.No. 88/2, Ac.5.00 cents in Sy. No. 88/1, Ac. 5.00 cents In sy. No. 88/7 and Ac. 3.00 cents in Sy. No. 88/3 of Rekulakunta, B.Mattam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, high handed and dilatory and consequently direct the respondents particularly 3’'^ respondent to dispose of the application of the petitioners submitted on 31.12.2024 for Incorporation of digital signature In the online web and In respect of petitioners’ respective bit of land and pass such other order. ” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioners made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direcffon to the respondents to dispose of the application dated 31.12.2024 submitted by the petitioners. 3 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the application dated 31.12.2024, if any pending with the respondents. 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh^”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioners himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the application dated 31.12.2024, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the application dated 31.12.2024 submitted by the petitioners, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of two(2) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 2019(8) SCALE 544 4 As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /ir^ SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary, State of Andhra Pradesh Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur. 2. The District Collector, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The Tahsildar, B.Mattam Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 4. One CC to SRI. L J VEERA REDDY Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. Three CD Copies Revenue <r' sree HIGH COURT DATED;09/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.13207 of 2025 disposing of the W.P. WITHOUT COSTS