NEM KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
/11426/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11426 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. Sri Ramakar Shukla appears for the informant.
2. This is second bail application of the accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in FIR/Case Crime No.83 of 2023 under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 120-B IPC and section 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Kaiserganj, District Bahraich. The first bail application of the applicant was dismissed as not pressed vide order dated 18.08.2023.
3. The counsel for the applicant argues that the co-accused have been enlarged on bail vide separate orders which are on record as Annexure no.11, although the applicant was assigned the role of carrying lathi danda, however, the allegations were general in nature for all the accused.
4. Considering the fact that the co-accused have been enlarged on bail and the applicant is in custody since 29.03.2023 and the criminal history has been explained, the applicant is entitled to bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
5. Let the applicant Nem Kumar Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shiv Pal Singh, Ambrish Kumar, Anurag Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Nem Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
6. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial expeditiously without giving any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties. November 24, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 11426 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench