RAM LAKHAN GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
/11068/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190255 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190255 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11068 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Heard.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length confines his prayer to his application made before the Station House Officer, Tandiyawan, Hardoi i.e. respondent No.3, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, being decided within a specified time. To the aforesaid prayer, learned A.G.A. has no objection.
3. Considering the aforesaid, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.3 to decide the pending application of the petitioner in accordance with law under relevant rules, which application should be decided within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. November 24, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Ram Lakhan Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench