HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 1166 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Farooq Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. It has been pointed out that revision has been rejected by the Deputy Director of Consolidation after noticing that chak which has been claimed by the petitioner was subject matter of revision No. 792 which was decided on 20.12.2023 and accordingly as the order dated 20.12.2023 could not have been disturbed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation in the proceedings initiated by the petitioner, his revision was rejected. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter up to some length submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition and seeks liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition after making appropriate application assailing order dated 20.12.2023, before the appropriate authority. 4. In the light of above, present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition after making appropriate application assailing order dated 20.12.2023, before the appropriate authority. December 8, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Farooqahmad, Kshitij Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Lateef Khan .....Petitioner(s) Deputy Director,Consolidation, Unnao And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench