Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190240 (ALL)

KRIPA SHANKAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BAISC EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/12881/2025 · 2025-11-04

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12881 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 to 5, Mr. P.K. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. Instant petition has been filed with the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to provide to the petitioner earned leave for a period of 300 days in respect of services so rendered for 428 days as B.R.C., N.P.R.C. and other government related activities which were duly approved by the Basic Shiksha Adhikari., in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 4 to take a decision on the representation of the the petitioner for providing earned leave to petitioner in respect of the period of 300 days for which the petitioner performed his duties ignoring the official leave so provided, in the interest of justice. (iii) Issue any other writ, order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. (iv) Allow the writ petition with costs." After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no. 4 and he may be directed to consider & decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh Kripa Shankar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Baisc Edu. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel for the opposite parties have no objection to the contention aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merit of the case, the petitioner is permitted to move a fresh representation within period of 15 days, and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the respondent no. 4/District Basic Education Officer, Pratapgarh is hereby directed to consider and decide the same, within a period of two months, in accordance with law, from the date, a certified copy of this order is produced before him. With the aforesaid observations, the instant petition is disposed of. November 4, 2025 Mayank WRIA No. 12881 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench