KAMLAPATI CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./ PRIN. SECY., EXCISE DEPTT., LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/12243/2025 · 2025-10-17
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190239 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190239 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12243 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging punishment order dated 10.03.2025 and appellate order dated 30.08.2025.
3. At the very outset learned counsel for petitioner, on the basis of instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw this petition in order to avail alternative remedy before the U.P. State Public Services Tribunal.
4. In view of aforesaid submissions, petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to petitioner to approach the U.P. State Public Services Tribunal. In case such a claim petition is filed, same may be decided expeditiously.
5. The petition stands disposed of. October 17, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Kumar Yadav, Hema Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Kamlapati Chaudhary .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./ Prin. Secy., Excise Deptt., Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench