HIRDYRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
/13561/2025 · 2025-11-24
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190231 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190231 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13561 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shailendra Singh Rajawat,
learned counsel for the respondent nos.4 & 5 and learned counsel for the State.
Instant petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 4 and 5 to carry out pay revision of the petitioner and ensure admissibility of the 2nd and 3rd A.C.P. to the petitioner from the date of his entitlement for the same and thereafter pay arrears of the same, in the interest of justice.
(ii) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite party no. 4 and 5 to ensure payment of gratuity after taking a decision on the papers/file so sent by the Principal of the Institution to the opposite party no. 5, in the interest of justice."
Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4 within fifteen days and direct the respondent no.4 to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Misra, Shambhu Kumar Sinha Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shailendra Singh Rajawat Hirdyram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Edu. Lko. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid.
Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.4/District Basic Education Officer, District Sultanpur, within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.4 is
directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
November 24, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13561 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench