Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19021 (GAU)

PRANESWAR DEKA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS.

WP(C)/6292/2018 · 2025-08-26

Arun Dev Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010202942018 2025:GAU-AS:11408 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6292/2018 PRANESWAR DEKA SON OF LATE DEBEN DEKA, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF CHAMATA, P.O. PACHIM CHAMATA, P.S. BELSAR, PIN- 781306 IN THE DIST. OF NALBARI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, ASSAM. 2:THE DIRECTOR PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. GOVT. OF ASSAM JURIPAR PANJABARI GUWAHATI- 37 ASSAM. 3:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NALBARI ZILLA PARISHAD NEAR NALBARI DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFFICE P.O. NALBARI DIST. NALBARI PIN- 781335 ASSAM. 4:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER PACHIM NALBARI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK Page No.# 2/3 RUPIABATHAN CHAMATA DIST. NALBARI ASSAM. 5:DINESH THAKURIA SON OF LATE SRI PARASURAM THAKURIA R/O. CHAMATA PIN- 781306 IN THE DIST. OF NALBARI ASSAM. 6:DAMBARUDHAR DEKA GRAM SEVAK PASCHIM NALBARI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK RUPIABATHAN CHAMATA DIST. NALBARI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B BHUYAN, MR. R B GOHAIN,MRS. S KALITA,MR. A KHOUND,MR. P MAHANTA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. M NATH (SC,PNRD) BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY O R D E R 27.08.2025 Heard Ms. J Saikia, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. B Bhuyan, learned Senior counsel for the petitioner. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they have lost contact with the client. Office note reflects that, no steps has been taken for issuance of notice upon the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 though notices were issued long back on 14.09.2018. The presence of respondent Nos. 5 and 6 are necessary for determination of the present case. Page No.# 3/3 In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of steps upon respondent Nos. 5 and 6. JUDGE Comparing Assistant