Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010262912020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 17323/2020 Between:
S KALYANI, SMT S. KALYANI W/O VENKATESHWARHT AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RIO 4-109/A, CHALLAGUNDLA NALARIKALLU, GUNTUR
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRL. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.I' SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARVATHI, AL'
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICERURAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT,AP
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SATTENPALLI, SATTENPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICE, SATTENPALLI, GUNTUR, AP
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VIJAY BHASKAR KAKUNOOR B Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent for not considering and registering the complaint dated 31-08-2020 lodged by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to Art. 14 and 2(of the Constitution of India and violation of Hon’ble Apex Full Court order in Lalitha Kumari vs Govt. Of U.P and Ors and it is disobedience by police for not following Lalitha Kumari order of Hon’ble Apex Court and consequently direct the respondents to register a crime against culprits named in the complaint and investigate into the matter by following due process of law.”
2
2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, the matter is purely of civil nature and the Respondent – Police never interfere with the civil disputes between the parties.
3. None appeared for the Petitioner.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of giving liberty to the Petitioner to work out her remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:09.09.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.17323 of 2020
Dt.09.09.2025
Dinesh