Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1902 (UTT)

NAHEED v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/210/2025 · 2025-03-27

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:2262 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 210 of 2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. 1. Ms. Sukhwani Singh, learned counsel holding the brief of Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht, learned A.G.A. with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. The present applicant ‘Naheed’ S/o Shaheed is praying for regular bail in relation to Case Crime No. 0015 of 2025 registered on the basis of First Information Report dated 04.01.2025, P.S. Laksar, District Haridwar. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and the prohibited drugs/injection, which has been shown to be recovered from the present applicant is below the commercial quantity and furthermore the applicant have no previous criminal history. 5. On the other side, learned A.G.A. Mr. Siddhartha Bisht on written instructions submits that the alleged prohibited drugs/injection, which was shown to be recovered from the present applicant is below a commercial quantity and also fairly submits that the applicant have no previous criminal history. 6. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration that the alleged prohibited drugs/injection, which was shown to be recovered from the present applicant is below a commercial quantity and the applicant have no previous criminal history, this court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant “Naheed” be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction 2025:UHC:2262 of the court concerned. 9. It is made clear if the applicant found to be indulged in any such criminal activity the prosecution is free move an application for cancellation of bail. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 27.03.2025 PR