Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19019 (CHH)

M/S L.C. KATRE v. MRS. NIHARIKA BARIK

CONT/566/2025 · 2025-07-21

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:35242 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 575 of 2025 1 - M/s L.C. Katre A Partnership Firm, Place Of Business At - Mission Road, Ratakhar, Korba, Chhattisgarh, Acting Through Its Partner Mr. L.C. Katre S/o B.L. Katre, Aged About 58 Yrs R/o Mission Road, Ratakhar, Korba, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Mrs. Niharika Barik Principal Secretary, Aged About 57 Years, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Government Of Chhattisgarh Sector- 19, North Block, Vikas Bhawan, Ground Floor, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Mr. K.K. Katare Aged About 56 Years, Chief Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Mr. Rahul Chandrakar Aged About 45 Years, Executive Engineer Cum Member Secretary, Project Implementation Unit No. 1, Cgrrda, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Dr. L.K. Paterigs Aged About 55 Years, National Rural Infrastructure Development Agency, Ministry Of Rural Development, Government Of India, 15 Nbcc Tower, 5th Floor, Bhikajicama Place, New Delhi. --- Respondent(s) VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.07.24 11:36:36 +0530 2 2025:CGHC:35241 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 566 of 2025 1 - M/s L.C. Katre A Partnership Firm Place Of Business At- Mission Road, Ratakhar, Korba, Chhattisgarh, Acting Through- Its Partner Mr. L.C. Katre S/o B.L. Katre, Aged About 58 Years R/o Mission Road, Ratakhar, Korba, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Mrs. Niharika Barik Aged About 57 Years Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Government Of Chhattisgarh Sector- 19, North Block, Vikas Bhawan, Ground Floor, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar Chhattisgarh 2 - Mr. K.K. Katare Aged About 56 Years Chief Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency Civil Lines, Raipur. 3 - Mr. Rahul Chandrakar Aged About 45 Years Executive Engineer Cum Member Secretary, Project Implementation Unit No. 1, Cgrrda, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Dr. L.K. Paterigs Aged About 55 Years National Rural Infrastructure Development Agency, Ministry Of Rural Development, Government Of India, 15 Nbcc Tower, 5th Floor, Bhikajicama Place, New Delhi. --- Respondent(s) 3 2025:CGHC:35243 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 583 of 2025 1 - M/s L.C. Katre A Partnership Firm, Place Of Business At - Mission Road, Ratakhar, Korba, Chhattisgarh, Acting Through Its Partner Mr. L.C. Katre S/o B.L. Katre, Aged About 58 Yrs R/o Mission Road Ratakhar, Korba, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Mrs. Niharika Barik Principal Secretary, Aged About 57 Years, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Government Of Chhattisgarh Sector- 19, North Block, Vikas Bhawan, Ground Floor, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Mr. K.K. Katare Aged About 56 Years, Chief Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Mr. Rahul Chandrakar Aged About 45 Years, Executive Engineer Cum Member Secretary, Project Implementation Unit No. 1, Cgrrda, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Dr. L.K. Paterigs Aged About 55 Years, National Rural Infrastructure Development Agency, Ministry Of Rural Development, Government Of India, 15 Nbcc Tower, 5th Floor, Bhikajicama Place, New Delhi. --- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Manubha Shankar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Harshwardhan Parganiha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate 4 Hon'ble Shri Justice R avindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 22/07/2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the orders under contempt have already been complied with, and now the petitioner does not want to prosecute the present contempt petitions further. 2. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petitions are dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved