HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9335 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing counsel for the State respondents no.1 and 2. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondent no. 3, is dispensed with. 2. Present petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayer:- " (i) Issue a writ of certiorari or a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 30.08.2025 passed by opposite party no.2 i.e. learned Court of Tehsildar, (Judicial), Tehsil Nawabganj, District Barabanki in the case number 4739/2022 computerized case no. T202204120104739 under Section 34/35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, Kalawati Vs. Munni Devi, is being contained as Annexure No.1 tot his writ petition in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to opposite parties no.1 to 4 most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to stay the operation and implementation of the impugned order dated 30.08.2025 passed by opposite party no.2 i.e. learned court of Tehsildar, (Judicial) Tehsil Nawabganj, District Barbanki in the case number 4739/2022 computerized case no. T202204120104739 under Section 34/35 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, Kalawati Vs. Munni Devi, is being contained as Annexure No.1 tot his writ petition in the interest of justice." 3. After arguing the matter at some length learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievances of the petitioners shall be redressed in case the application for interim relief preferred bu the petitioners shall be considered and decided with expedition. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Gopal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Pratap And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid prayer. 5. Accordingly, considering the aforesaid submissions the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decided the application for interim relief with expedition, say within next six weeks. 6. In case, it is not possible to decide the same within the time prescribed above, he shall decide the same within two weeks thereafter. 7. It is further provided that in case it is not possible to decide the application for interim relief the respondent No.2 shall consider passing ad interim injunction if a case is so made out. October 7, 2025 Muk WRIC No. 9335 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench