Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190183 (ALL)

MAJOR DR. YASH SHRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

/9916/2025 · 2025-11-24

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9916 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. None is present for opposite party No., 2. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. 3. This application has been filed mainly with the prayer to quash the Charge-Sheet dated 08.12.2021 annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the instant application arising out of FIR/Case Crime No. 0341 of 2021 at Police Station Gazipur, District- Lucknow, on the basis of Compromise Agreement dated 24.09.2024, annexed as Annexure No. 6. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which is said to have taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 6 to the application. Learned counsel for the applicant also submits that it appears that due to some personal reasons nobody is not present for the opposite party No. 2, however, he assures the court that he will inform the opposite party No. 2 about the order passed by this court. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Neeraj Kumar Saxena, Amit Kumar Tiwari, Ayushi Singh, Gaurav Saxena, Jayaditya Rai, Rishi Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Major Dr. Yash Shrivastava .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 24, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9916 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench